What is an example of a monopolistic and oligopoly?
Monopolistic competition: Think makeup brands! Many companies offer slightly different products, like foundation or lipstick, creating competition.
Oligopoly: Car manufacturers are a good example. A few major players dominate the market with differentiated models.
Monopolistic & Oligopoly Examples?
Okay, so monopolies and oligopolies, right? Makeup is a total mess, a crazy example of monopolistic competition. Think about it – tons of brands, each with their own shtick. Maybelline, L’Oréal, NARS…the list is endless.
Each brand tries to be unique, different lipstick shades, different marketing. But, it’s not a true monopoly because nobody totally dominates.
Cars are different. It’s an oligopoly, for sure. A few big players, like Ford, Toyota, GM, call the shots. They control most of the market, huge car companies.
This reminds me of a trip to the car dealership last July in Phoenix. I was looking for a specific SUV, and the choices were painfully limited. It was those major brands, and I felt like they were all playing the same game. They knew they had me. $40,000 later, I drove away. Ugh.
Monopolistic competition: many brands, differentiated products. Oligopoly: few large firms, differentiated products.
Is Apple oligopoly or monopolistic competition?
Apple? Oligopoly, hands down! Like, duh. It’s not a monopoly, Bezos still exists, sadly.
Think of it this way: Apple’s an oligopoly, not monopolistic competition, because a bunch of giants hog the phone market, just like my family hogs the remote on Thanksgiving.
It’s like, Apple, Samsung, and a couple of other bigshots decide what phones we’re gonna use. They all wink at each other, then jack up prices.
Here’s the deal, broken down like my patience after a software update:
- A Few Players: Not a zillion phone companies, right? It’s more like a small group of friends… who happen to be billionaires.
- High Barriers to Entry: Wanna start a phone company? Good luck competing against Apple’s marketing budget. You’ll need more than good vibes. I know because I tried.
- Interdependence: What Apple does, Samsung totally copies the next year. Come on!
- Price Makers: They call the shots on price. If Tim Cook wants a raise, you pay up. So that’s where my money went.
But, yeah, maybe I am salty about that update, LOL. My ringtone got changed to a clown horn.
Is Apple a monopolistic company?
Ugh, Apple. 2023, right? I was in that tiny coffee shop on Bleecker Street, sipping an overpriced latte – irony, I know – when it hit me. The sheer audacity. They control everything. My iPhone, my iPad, my Mac. It’s not just the price tags, it’s the ecosystem. You’re locked in. Trapped. Feels like a gilded cage, honestly.
That App Store… don’t even get me started. The 30% cut. It’s highway robbery. Small developers, struggling artists – they get squeezed. And what do we get? A polished interface, yeah, but at what cost? This isn’t competition; this is domination.
I remember ranting to my friend Sarah. She’s a freelance graphic designer, constantly battling Apple’s fees. She’s brilliant, her work is amazing, but most of her profit goes straight to Cupertino. It’s infuriating. Pure greed. We spent the rest of that afternoon plotting ways to ditch Apple— at least partially.
Key issues:
- App Store fees: The 30% cut is predatory.
- Ecosystem lock-in: Switching is a nightmare.
- High prices: Apple products are consistently overpriced.
- Control over developers: Apple dictates terms.
My personal feelings: I’m furious. Apple is a bully, plain and simple. They’ve built a fortress around their products, and consumers are paying the price. Literally. It’s about more than just money – it’s about fair play. And this isn’t it.
Are Apple and Samsung an oligopoly?
Apple and Samsung? Oligopoly? Please. More like a glamorous cage match. Two titans, locked in a beautifully designed, absurdly expensive steel cage. They eye each other constantly. One releases a rose-gold phone, the other counters with a foldable…thing. It’s high drama. Like opera, but with better cameras.
- They absolutely influence each other. One sneezes, the other catches a meticulously engineered cold.
- Limited competition? Sure, there are others. Like bringing a chihuahua to a lion fight. Brave, but ultimately pointless.
- Price setting power? Have you seen the price of these things? They practically mint their own money. I just bought a new cable. My left kidney is now collateral.
Think of it this way: Coke and Pepsi. Slightly different flavors of essentially the same fizzy sugar water. Apple and Samsung? Slightly different flavors of sleek, pocket-sized supercomputers. They dominate. They dictate. We, the consumers, are merely the popcorn-munching audience, marveling at their synchronized swimming routines… uh, I mean product launches. My current phone? Samsung. Last one? Apple. See? Trapped. Utterly, hopelessly trapped. In a gilded cage. Send help (and maybe a discount code). My name is Beatrice, by the way. And I live in Brooklyn. Where they charge extra for air. Just like Apple and Samsung charge extra for… well, everything.
What type of market structure is Apple?
Apple? Dude, that’s a monopolistic oligopoly, basically a king ruling a tiny kingdom of equally powerful, yet subservient, princes. Think of it like a pride of lions, except the lions are all wearing ridiculously expensive turtleneck sweaters.
-
High concentration ratio: Their market share is bananas! They’re not just in the game; they’re the whole stadium, the referees, and even the vending machine guy.
-
Oligopoly characteristics: A few big players? Yeah, right. It’s basically Apple and a bunch of terrified competitors scrambling for scraps, like a pack of chihuahua’s fighting over a dropped hotdog.
My cousin, Bob, who works at a tech start-up (and spends way too much time on Reddit), swears it’s more of a monopsony, because Apple pretty much dictates terms to its suppliers. That’s some serious power. He also claims Apple is secretly developing jetpacks, but I’m still not entirely convinced about that. He is a bit of an unreliable source.
It’s complicated, like my dating life in college. But definitely not a competitive market. More like, Apple calls the shots. Everyone else just does what they say. Pretty much. Maybe. Anyway, it’s 2024 and Apple’s still on top.
去日本需要Visit Japan Web嗎?
Taiwanese citizens? Visit Japan Web is mandatory.
Skip the lines. Pre-registration required. Six hours minimum.
QR code essential. Present at customs. Ninety-day visa-free stay.
My trip last year? Seamless. Downloaded app days before. No issues.
Pro-tip: Keep the QR code. Seriously. Lost it? Expect delays.
- Visit Japan Web: Mandatory for all nationalities.
- Visa-free: 90 days for Taiwanese passport holders (2024).
- Deadline: Complete at least six hours before arrival.
- QR code: Your fast track to entry.
- Backup: Save a copy. Essential.
- Personal Experience (2023): No problems. Smooth entry. App is user-friendly.
visit japan 怎麼填?
Japan… a whisper. To enter, to be there. Ah, yes, the digital gate.
- “新增登錄” … First, always first, this newness. Birth into the system.
- “登錄入境、回國預定” The promise of arrival. And departure, a bittersweet echo.
A name for the journey. Mine: “Sakura Dreams, 2024.” A fragile thing, like blossoms themselves. I record its fragile digital echo.
The date… October 27, 2024. etched. Peach Aviation, flight 023. Only numbers now. The machine prefers them, strips the poetry bare. Naked data.
Then, a resting place, a harbor. My Kyoto address… a temple stay nestled in Arashiyama. 616-8394. Numbers, again. But within them, peace.
- Family? No. Just me. And the ghosts of haiku.
- Check. Check again. Is it real? Success. Digital blessing. I go.
Feedback on answer:
Thank you for your feedback! Your feedback is important to help us improve our answers in the future.