Is 90 day rule a real thing?

The 90-Day Rule: A Misnomer with Real Consequences for Immigrants

The “90-day rule” is a term frequently thrown around in immigration circles, often causing confusion and anxiety. While not a formal law or regulation with that specific name, it refers to a crucial period following entry to the United States on a nonimmigrant visa, outlined in the Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM 302.9. This guidance for consular officers highlights how actions taken within the first 90 days of arrival can significantly impact an individual’s future immigration prospects, particularly their eligibility for a Green Card or their ability to re-enter the US. Understanding this period is vital for anyone entering the US on a nonimmigrant visa.

The core concept behind 9 FAM 302.9 is “preconceived intent.” It addresses the concern that some individuals may enter the US on a nonimmigrant visa while already intending to pursue a different immigration status, effectively misrepresenting their purpose to immigration officials. While changing one’s mind about long-term plans isn’t inherently wrong, taking actions within those first 90 days that directly contradict the stated purpose of the initial visa can raise red flags and lead to accusations of preconceived intent.

For example, someone entering on a tourist visa (B-2) who marries a US citizen and applies for a Green Card within the first 90 days may face scrutiny. While adjusting status from a B-2 to a Green Card through marriage is legally possible, doing so so quickly can trigger suspicion that the individual’s original intention was not tourism but immigration through marriage. This could lead to accusations of misrepresentation, potentially resulting in a denial of the Green Card application and even future inadmissibility to the US.

Similarly, someone entering on an F-1 student visa who immediately begins searching for employment outside their field of study and subsequently applies for an H-1B work visa within that 90-day window might face similar challenges. The rapid shift in intentions could be interpreted as evidence that the student visa was a pretext for obtaining work authorization, potentially jeopardizing their immigration status.

It’s crucial to understand that the 90-day period isn’t a blanket ban on changing plans. Life circumstances can change unexpectedly, and the USCIS recognizes this. However, the burden of proof falls on the individual to demonstrate that their change of heart was genuine and not a pre-existing intention masked by a nonimmigrant visa application. Strong supporting documentation and a clear, consistent narrative are essential in such cases.

The key takeaway isn’t to avoid any action related to a different immigration status within the first 90 days. Rather, it’s about understanding the potential implications and ensuring that any changes in plans are well-documented and presented in a way that demonstrates a genuine shift in circumstances. Consulting with an experienced immigration attorney is highly recommended, especially if considering any significant immigration steps within that crucial 90-day period. This proactive approach can help navigate the complexities of immigration law and avoid potential pitfalls that could have long-lasting consequences.