Do any movies have 0% on Rotten Tomatoes?

17 views
A minuscule percentage of films achieve the dubious distinction of a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. This indicates unanimous critical panning, a rare feat achieved by only a handful of movies—fewer than forty—in the sites history, each with over twenty reviews.
Comments 0 like

The Notorious 0%: A Rare Mark of Critical Contempt

In the sprawling landscape of cinema, a minuscule number of films endure the unenviable fate of earning a dismal 0% rating on the esteemed review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes. This unsparing judgment represents a resounding consensus of critical derision, a rarity reserved for the most abject cinematic failures.

Rotten to the Core

A 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes signifies that not a single critic among the site’s designated reviewers has found any redeeming qualities in a given film. It’s a damning verdict that effectively brands a movie as an unmitigated disaster.

A Brief Roll Call of Infamy

Throughout Rotten Tomatoes’ history, fewer than forty films have suffered this critical annihilation. Each of these cinematic pariahs has garnered over twenty reviews, ensuring that their abysmal reception is not merely an isolated incident.

Notable examples include:

  • Gigli (2003): A romantic comedy that earned ridicule for its wooden performances and cringe-worthy plot.
  • The Room (2003): A notoriously bizarre and inept drama that has become an ironic cult classic.
  • Manos: The Hands of Fate (1966): An unintentionally hilarious horror film that has garnered a reputation as one of the worst movies ever made.

Rarity of the Distinction

The 0% rating is an exceedingly rare occurrence. Only a fraction of films released each year achieve even a moderate Rotten Tomatoes score, let alone the dubious distinction of scoring zero.

This low percentage reflects the demanding standards of professional film critics and the fact that most movies, even those with significant flaws, can find some measure of critical support.

A Sobering Warning

For aspiring filmmakers, a 0% rating serves as a sobering reminder of the importance of artistic integrity and technical competence. It highlights the consequences of releasing a film that fails to meet even the most basic standards of storytelling and execution.

Conclusion

The 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes is a harsh but accurate reflection of unanimous critical contempt. It is a rare but undeniable badge of cinematic infamy, a testament to the enduring power of critical judgment in the face of even the most abysmal cinematic endeavors.