What are military wives called?

Beyond “Military Wife”: Embracing Inclusive Language in the Armed Forces

For generations, the term “military wife” has been synonymous with resilience, sacrifice, and unwavering support. It evokes images of strong women navigating deployments, managing households single-handedly, and building communities wherever the military sends them. While the term carries a certain weight of tradition, a closer examination reveals its limitations and the need for a more inclusive approach to language within the Department of Defense (DoD).

The evolving landscape of the military, where women serve in increasing numbers and same-sex marriages are recognized, necessitates a shift in how we refer to the partners of service members. Limiting ourselves to “military wife” excludes husbands, same-sex partners, and others who play equally vital roles in supporting their loved ones serving our country.

Beyond simply acknowledging changing demographics, adopting more neutral language also aligns the DoD with other government agencies, like the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The IRS uses terms like “spouse,” “partner,” or “significant other” to refer to individuals married to taxpayers, regardless of gender. This consistency in terminology helps clarify the often-blurred line between spouses and dependents, particularly when it comes to tax benefits, healthcare, and other entitlements.

Consider the potential for confusion. A “dependent” could be a child, a parent, or even a spouse. Using the term “spouse” in official documents and communications immediately clarifies the individual’s relationship to the service member and ensures they receive the appropriate benefits and consideration. This clarity is especially crucial when dealing with complex financial or legal matters related to military service.

Furthermore, using inclusive language demonstrates respect and recognition for all individuals who support their service member partners. It sends a powerful message that the military values the contributions of everyone, regardless of gender or marital orientation. This inclusive approach fosters a stronger sense of community and belonging, vital for maintaining morale and strengthening the bonds that hold military families together.

Moving away from the restrictive term “military wife” isn’t about erasing history or diminishing the sacrifices of women who have long held that title. It’s about acknowledging a changing reality and embracing language that reflects the diverse nature of modern military families. By adopting neutral terms like “spouse,” “partner,” or “significant other,” the DoD can ensure clarity, promote inclusivity, and demonstrate its unwavering support for all those who serve alongside their loved ones in uniform. This seemingly small change in vocabulary can have a significant impact on the lives and experiences of countless individuals who dedicate their lives to supporting our nation’s defense.