What is not the type of threat?

34 views

Unlike interception and fabrication, which represent genuine cybersecurity threats, creation poses no inherent risk to computer systems. Creation, in this context, is a neutral action; it neither compromises data nor disrupts operations. Threats involve malicious actions, whereas creation is simply the act of making something.

Comments 0 like

The Cybersecurity Myth of “Creation” as a Threat

The world of cybersecurity is rife with threats, from the insidious to the blatantly malicious. We constantly hear about interception (unauthorized access to data) and fabrication (the creation of false data), both representing significant dangers to our digital lives. However, a less obvious, and often overlooked, concept needs clarification: the idea of “creation” as a cybersecurity threat. This article argues that, in contrast to interception and fabrication, creation itself is not a threat.

The confusion stems from a semantic overlap. While fabrication, a type of creation, is undeniably a threat, the act of creating something new, in and of itself, is inherently neutral. Building a new software program, designing a website, or even writing a simple script – these acts of creation hold no inherent risk to computer systems. They don’t compromise data integrity, disrupt network operations, or grant unauthorized access.

To clarify, consider the following analogy: a knife can be used to prepare a meal (a beneficial action) or to commit a crime (a malicious action). The knife itself isn’t inherently good or bad; its potential for harm depends entirely on its use. Similarly, the act of creation is a tool. It can be used to build malicious software (fabrication), which is unequivocally a threat, or it can be used to build a security system (a protective measure). The act of creation itself remains neutral.

Focusing on “creation” as a blanket cybersecurity threat misdirects resources and attention. It’s crucial to differentiate between the neutral act of creation and the malicious intent or outcome behind the creation. The true threats lie in the malicious use of created objects or the processes that lead to their creation – such as exploiting vulnerabilities during the development process. Investigating the motivation and the methods employed, not simply the act of creation itself, is key to effective cybersecurity.

In conclusion, while the creation of malicious tools like malware is a serious cybersecurity threat, the act of creation itself is not. Confusing the two confounds effective threat assessment and mitigation strategies. Our focus should remain on identifying and addressing malicious actions and intentions, not the neutral process of creation.

#Nonthreats #Security #Threattypes