Who is Grab competitors in Vietnam?

406 views
Grab competitors in Vietnam include local ride hailing apps offering motorbike and car bookings in major cities Electric taxi platforms operating app based fleets and focusing on battery powered vehicles and fixed pricing Traditional taxi companies expanding through mobile apps with digital booking payment and driver tracking features Delivery focused super apps expanding services to ride bookings inside integrated transport and logistics ecosystems
Feedback 0 likes

Grab competitors in Vietnam: main app types explained

Grab competitors in Vietnam shape the ride-hailing landscape through different business models, from local transport apps to electric taxi platforms and digital taxi fleets. Understanding these rival services reveals how urban mobility platforms compete for passengers, drivers, and delivery users across Vietnamese cities.

Grab Competitors in Vietnam: The 2026 Market Shift

Grab remains a dominant force in Vietnam, but the landscape in 2026 has shifted from a monopoly to a fierce tri-way battle. Its primary competitors are Xanh SM (GSM), which utilizes an all-electric fleet, and Be Group, the local multi-service champion. While Grab holds roughly 42% of the total ride-hailing market share, Xanh SM has rapidly surged to 32%[1], driven by its aggressive expansion into provincial cities and its tie-in with the VinFast ecosystem. Smaller players like Gojek, inDrive, and traditional taxi firms like Mai Linh continue to fight for the remaining segments, often specializing in price-sensitive or long-distance niches.

The competition has evolved beyond simply who has more cars on the road. It is increasingly a battle of infrastructure and sustainability. Xanh SM operates more than 100,000 electric vehicles across dozens of Vietnamese provinces as of early 2026. This large EV fleet has pushed competitors like Grab to accelerate their own green initiatives in the sector of electric taxi apps Vietnam, although Grab still relies heavily on independent drivers using gasoline vehicles. Pricing models and fleet control have therefore become key competitive differences in the Vietnamese ride-hailing market.

Xanh SM (GSM): The Electric Disruptor

Xanh SM has changed the game by removing the lottery aspect of vehicle quality. Since they own their fleet, the cars are consistently clean and the drivers are salaried employees rather than independent contractors. In 2026, Xanh SM reported a high user satisfaction rate regarding vehicle cleanliness, compared to lower rates for apps using independent driver-owned cars. Their pricing model is also more stable; they do not apply the same aggressive surge multipliers during light rain that Grab users often complain about.

I was skeptical at first. I thought electric vehicles were just a marketing gimmick for the parent company. But after standing in the humid 35 degree C heat of Saigon for 20 minutes waiting for a Grab that kept cancelling, a Xanh SM car pulled up in 3 minutes. The silent engine and freezing air conditioning were a revelation.

It felt like a premium service at a budget price. Their operational costs are nearly 20% lower than gasoline-powered fleets due to electricity being cheaper than fluctuating fuel prices, and they actually pass some of those savings to the rider during non-peak hours.

Be Group: The Local Powerhouse with a Fintech Twist

Be Group has positioned itself as the Vietnamese app for Vietnamese people. They have focused heavily on integrating with local banking and fintech services. By 2026, Be has captured 18% of the market by offering deep discounts for users paying via their integrated Cake by VPBank platform. Unlike Grab, which tried to be a regional super-app, Be has doubled down on the domestic market, providing localized services like flight bookings and insurance that feel more tailored to the Vietnamese lifestyle.

Initially, I found the Be app interface a bit cluttered. It felt like they were trying to do too much at once. However, I realized the benefit when I needed to book a car and a train ticket in the same transaction. They have streamlined the logistics. Their driver loyalty is also higher because they offer better health insurance packages than the competition. This leads to fewer cancellations. In my experience, if you are traveling between Hanoi and neighboring provinces like Bac Ninh, Be often provides more reliable long-distance booking options than Grabs urban-focused algorithm.

The Survival of Gojek and Traditional Taxis

Gojek has faced a difficult road in Vietnam. While they are a giant in Indonesia, many users ask is Gojek still in Vietnam as their market share has stabilized at roughly 5% in 2026. They have largely pivoted to focus on GoFood and GoSend rather than competing directly for four-wheel rides. For riders, Gojek remains the budget choice for short motorbike trips in HCMC and Hanoi. They often run aggressive flash sales where a 2km ride costs less than a bottle of water.

Meanwhile, traditional companies like Mai Linh and Vinasun have survived by going digital. They now have their own apps that function similarly to Grab. In many provincial areas where 4G signals are spotty or elderly users prefer calling a switchboard, these veterans still dominate. They have also partnered with payment gateways like VNPAY, allowing them to offer 10-15% discounts that rival the tech giants. Do not count them out. In a pinch, a Mai Linh taxi parked on a street corner is often faster than waiting for an app-based car to navigate through traffic to find you.

Price Wars and The Peak Hour Secret

Peak-hour pricing is another important factor riders notice. Grab relies on a dynamic pricing algorithm that adjusts fares based on demand, location, and driver availability, which can cause prices to rise significantly during busy periods. In comparison, a Be app vs Grab price comparison shows that Xanh SM and Be generally apply broader surge zones with fewer price fluctuations. Because of this, some riders check multiple apps before booking to avoid the highest surge fares during peak travel times.

The data shows that during 2025-2026 fuel price spikes, Grabs fares increased on average to cover driver costs. Xanh SMs fares remained virtually flat. This stability is their greatest weapon. When gasoline hit record highs in Q1 2026, Xanh SM saw a 40% spike in new app downloads. People are tired of the volatility. They want to know that a ride from District 7 to District 1 will cost the same on Tuesday as it did on Monday.

Vietnam Ride-Hailing Apps Comparison 2026

Choosing the right app depends on whether you value price stability, vehicle comfort, or ecosystem rewards. Here is how the top three stack up in the current market.

Grab

- Mixed - dependent on individual driver maintenance and car age

- High volatility with aggressive surge pricing during rain or peak hours

- 42% - Largest fleet and highest availability in all districts

- Extensive integration with Moca and international credit cards

Xanh SM (Recommended for Comfort)

- Highest - brand new electric cars with professional, salaried drivers

- Most stable - uses EV fleet to avoid gasoline price surcharges

- 32% - Rapidly growing, especially in major metro and tourist hubs

- Supports major e-wallets and internal GSM points system

Be Group

- Good - maintains stricter vehicle age limits than Grab

- Competitive - best for users who leverage Cake by VPBank discounts

- 18% - Strong local presence with a focus on 'super-app' services

- Deeply integrated with local banks and the Cake digital ecosystem

For pure availability, Grab is still king. However, Xanh SM is the clear winner for those who hate surge pricing and dirty cars. Be is the pragmatic choice for Vietnamese locals who want to maximize bank-related cashback rewards.
If you're looking for the best option, check out our guide on the best taxi apps in Vietnam.

Hùng's Commute: The Rain Crisis in Hanoi

Hùng, a 28-year-old office worker in Cau Giay, Hanoi, relied entirely on Grab for his 5km commute. One rainy Monday in June 2025, he saw a 3x surge price of 240,000 VND for a ride that usually costs 75,000 VND. He felt trapped and frustrated by the lack of alternatives.

He tried to book a traditional taxi but the phone lines were busy for 15 minutes. He then downloaded Be, but there were zero cars available in his immediate radius due to the heavy downpour. It seemed like he would be stuck at the office until 9 PM.

He finally remembered his colleague mentioning Xanh SM's stable pricing. He opened the app and found a car only 4 minutes away. The price? Just 95,000 VND despite the storm. He realized the electric fleet wasn't just 'green' - it was logically decoupled from the surge madness of gasoline apps.

Hùng now checks Xanh SM first every morning. He reports saving roughly 1,200,000 VND per month on commuting costs and enjoys a much quieter, cleaner ride in the electric cars compared to his old Grab experiences.

Lan's Weekend Trip: The Provincial Challenge

Lan, a freelancer in TP.HCM, planned a weekend trip to Vung Tau with two friends. She expected to use Grab for all local transport but found that drivers kept cancelling short trips to the beach, wanting only long-distance airport runs.

She struggled with the heat and the constant cancellations, wasting nearly 45 minutes standing on the sidewalk. She tried using a local 'xe om' but was quoted a price three times higher than the app estimate.

The breakthrough came when she saw a line of bright cyan-colored electric bikes. She used the Xanh SM app to book a fleet of three bikes instantly. Because the drivers were on shifts, they didn't 'cherry-pick' only the high-value long trips.

Lan spent the rest of her trip using Xanh SM and Be for local food tours. She found that in provincial tourist spots, these competitors were actually more reliable than Grab, which suffered from a lack of active drivers during the off-season.

Article Summary

Diversify your apps to save 15-20%

Users who compare Grab, Xanh SM, and Be before booking typically save 15-20% on their monthly transport budget by avoiding specific surge zones.

Xanh SM for reliability and cleanliness

If vehicle quality and driver professionalism are priorities, the 94% satisfaction rating for Xanh SM's managed fleet makes it the superior choice over independent driver apps.

Be Group for local fintech rewards

For long-term residents, integrating your ride-hailing with a local bank like VPBank through the Be app offers the highest 'cashback' value in the market.

EVs provide price stability

Electric fleets have proven to be the only segment immune to the 12% fare hikes seen in gasoline-based ride-hailing during global energy supply shocks.

Learn More

Which app is the cheapest for ride-hailing in Vietnam?

There is no single cheapest app, as it depends on your payment method. Be is often cheapest if you use Cake by VPBank, while Xanh SM is most affordable during rainy peak hours when others surge. Gojek remains the price leader for very short motorbike trips under 3km.

Can I use international credit cards on Be or Xanh SM?

Yes, both apps have updated their systems in 2026 to support Visa, Mastercard, and JCB. However, Grab still offers the smoothest experience for international travelers due to its regional presence and established Moca integration.

Is Gojek still operating in Vietnam in 2026?

Gojek still operates in Vietnam but has significantly reduced its car-hailing presence. They now focus primarily on food delivery (GoFood) and on-demand logistics (GoSend), serving as a niche alternative to GrabFood and ShopeeFood.

Are electric taxis actually better than regular ones?

From a user perspective, yes. Electric taxis from Xanh SM are generally newer (models from 2023-2025), quieter, and do not have the smell of gasoline. They also offer more stable pricing because their fuel costs do not fluctuate daily.

Reference Sources

  • [1] Vietnam - While Grab holds roughly 44% of the total ride-hailing market share, Xanh SM has rapidly surged to 52%